Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. City of Tulsa v. Mayes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1935No. 25288PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an original action in which the city of Tulsa seeks a writ of prohibition against W. E. Mayes, as county treasurer of Mayes county, and Lee Battenfield, as judge of the county court of said county.
The application for the writ alleges that about October 30, 1933, Earl Ward, the duly appointed tax ferret for Mayes county, filed with the county treasurer a report to the effect that the real property, dam, conduit lines, and appurtenances thereunto connected, constituting the Spavin aw water project, had been omitted from the tax rolls of Mayes county for the years 1923 to 1932,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City & County of San Francisco v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Board of County Commissioners v. WarramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.