Legal Opinion

Benevento v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 26, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The exceptions of the impleaded respondent, Union Stevedoring . Corporation, to the petition of the petitioner, United States of America, and American Export Lines, Inc., have been brought on for a hearing by the usual notice. The “exception” in admiralty performs the function of the “demurrer,” formerly employed at common law or in equity. An exception to a pleading in admiralty should not be sustained if any cause of action is well pleaded in the pleading to which the exception is filed. The S. S. Nea Hellis, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 803. All well pleaded allegations must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Barbarino v. Stanhope S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. The S. S. Nea HellisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. Benevento v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Severn v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  5. West Africa Navigation, Ltd., of Monrovia v. Ore & Ferro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API