Legal Opinion
Severn v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1946PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Exceptions by the Cardinal Engineering Company [hereinafter referred to as Car dinal] respondent-impleaded, to the libels and petitions of the United States of America. The exceptions are similar in each of the above entitled suits.
The several libelants and the decedent in the Traína case were employees of Cardinal who was engaged under a contract with the United States [War Shipping Administration] in making repairs to the ships SS Hilton and SS Douglas, then in this harbor, and owned and operated by the United States. Each of the employees and the Traina’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Burris v. American Chicle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Porello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.