Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation and CompSer-vices, Inc. (collectively, Employer) ask whether the workers’ compensation authorities erred in denying their petition for review of a utilization review (UR) determination. Additionally, Employer challenges the grant of Larry Clippinger’s (Claimant) petition to review medical treatment and/or billing and his penalty petition. Employer argues the workers’ compensation authorities erred in: (1) determining Employer was responsible for the unliquidated costs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Rieger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Haga v. Clay Hyder Trucking LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- A & J Builders, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pocono Mountain School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Frankiewicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kinder Morgan, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.