Legal Opinion
Charles MacHine Works, Inc. v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 26, 2013No. 2012-1578PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The Charles Machine Works, Inc. (CMW) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Vermeer Manufacturing Company’s (Vermeer) accused commercial products and non-commercial prototypes do not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. CMW also challenges whether the prototypes were properly within the scope of summary judgment. We hold that CMW did not have sufficient notice that the prototypes were within the scope of the summary judgment decision, and thus vacate-in-part and remand. Regarding the accused commercial products, we affirm…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Robert Wilson v. David Spain, Mike JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Grober v. Mako Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Epos Technologies Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.