Legal Opinion
Epos Technologies Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 5, 2014No. 2013-1330PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Pegasus Technologies Ltd. and Luidia, Inc., own several patents relating to digital pens and receiver devices which, they allege, the Appellees have infringed. Following claim construction of certain terms in the patents, the district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Appellees. Because we conclude that the district court erred in construing four claim terms and in granting summary judgment of nonin-fringement, we vacate-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
Appellants allege…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Daiichi Sankyo Company v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Schwalier v. DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppmann CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.