Wardall v. State
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are licensed by the Board of Equalization (hereinafter referred to as board) as wholesalers and importers of distilled spirits pursuant to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1123; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1935 Supp., Act 3796), and the issue is whether the board-may make a deficiency tax assessment and levy after having previously levied an assessment for the same period.
In the Cavagnaro case, from a report by the board’s auditors after an audit of Cavagnaro’s records, a tax of $647.31 was levied for the period July 1, 1935, to December 31,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fullerton Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Los Angeles v. Board of Equalization of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Whiting Finance Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- City & County of San Francisco v. La Societe Francaise D'Epargnes Et De Prevoyance MutuelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- García Commercial, Inc. v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Northrop Aircraft, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- García Commercial, Inc. v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988