People v. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento county and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
The action was brought to recover taxes assessed to respondent, a national banking association, organized under the acts of Congress.
On the first Monday in March, 1895, it had real property in Sacramento, also personal property consisting of safes and fixtures, and money on hand and money on special deposit.
The blank form for a statement, with demand for a list, was served on it by the assessor, and it was returned with a description of certain real estate, and safes and fixtures, valued at five thousand dollars. The assessor was dissatisfied with this and returned it to the president of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Rosenblatt v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Burke v. BadlamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- McAndrews v. ThatcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Chesebrough v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Roberts v. American National Bank of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.