Legal Opinion
Nicholas v. Oklahoma City Mailer's Union No. 30
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1955No. 36457PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The order in which the parties to this appeal appear here is the same in which they appeared in the trial court; and we will hereinafter refer to them as “plaintiff” and “defendants”, as they appeared there.
Plaintiff, at all times material to this controversy was an employee of the Oklahoma Publishing Company, which publishes the Daily Oklahoman newspaper and other publications in Oklahoma City. Previous to May 16, 1949, his position with said company was that of a “Station Manager.” On May 14, 1949, members of the defendant union who were regularly employed in the “mailing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Bereman v. Power Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Wimmer v. Oklahoma Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Fahy v. Melrose Free Press Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Company, Inc. And E. O. Blake v. Cullom S. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Atlas Sewing Centers, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Independent Sewing Machine DealersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Atlas Sewing Centers, Inc. v. National Association Of Independent Sewing Machine DealersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958