Legal Opinion

Fahy v. Melrose Free Press Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is an action for libel. The declaration is in two counts. Each count sets forth that the plaintiff was a lieutenant in the police department of Melrose and that the defendant published concerning the plaintiff a false and malicious libel as follows: “ ‘With the tax rate at $36, the highest on record, overburdened taxpayers believe that every city department should adopt methods to insure savings in their expense wherever possible. One way in which apparently a considerable sum could be saved appears to be in the police department where the lieutenant (Fahy),’ meaning the plaintiff, 'uses…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Carleton & Hovey Co. v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Twombly v. MonroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Lyman v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Bishop v. Journal Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Ingalls v. Hastings & Sons Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Cohen v. BowdoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Poland v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API