Legal Opinion
Hultin v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1970No. Civ. No. 34631PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GUSTAFSON, J.
Defendant Charlotte C. Taylor appeals from a judgment in favor of Eskil Hultin for $7,000 with interest at 7 percent from September 21, 1964, to the date of judgment.
We devote our attention to whether there is substantial evidence in support of the judgment on the cause of action on which the judgment is based.
Plaintiff and defendant were married June 19, 1964. After their honeymoon, they resided for a short time in a house which defendant had acquired as her separate property before marriage. The property was subject to a deed of trust securing a note.
In August 1964 the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Grant v. De OtteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ciambetti v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pentz v. KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Gary P. KaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983