Pentz v. Kuppinger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing her action against defendant pursuant to the provisions of section 581, subdivision 3, Code of Civil Procedure, when she declined to amend her amended complaint after a demurrer thereto had been sustained with leave to amend and, as expressly provided by the statute, moved for such dismissal. In addition to other relief, the action sought recovery of assertedly excessive amounts collected by defendant under a Mexican judgment based, in turn, upon an earlier judgment in a California.divorce proceeding.
We find the relevant background…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Avila-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Java Oil Ltd. v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ackerman v. AckermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Vincent De Fontbrune v. Alan WofsyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.