Legal Opinion
Ciambetti v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1958No. Civ. 9256PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This appeal arises out of an accusation containing two counts filed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, hereinafter referred to as the department. In Count I plaintiff was charged with having refilled two one-quart bottles of whiskey. Count II charged that plaintiff for some time has not been the sole owner of the business operated by her, but that her husband, James Ciambetti, is a part owner thereof in violation of sections 23300, 23355, 23951, 24040 and 24200, subdivision (e), of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
A hearing officer before whom the matter was heard found both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Dyment v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stark v. StarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Calloway v. DownieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hultin v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Estate of J. Leslie Vogel, Robert G. Partridge, and Elizabeth S. Vogel, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.