Southern Auto Company v. Fletcher
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In 12 Am. Jur. 630, § 137, it is stated: “The rule that one who signs a contract is presumed to know its contents has been applied even to contracts of illiterate persons on the ground that if such persons are unable to read, they are negligent if they fail to have the contract read to them. If a person can not read the instrument, it is as much his duty to procure some reliable person to read.and explain it to him, before he signs it, as it would be to read it before he signed it if he were able to do so, and his failure to obtain a reading and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Sponseller v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Grimsley v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Bates v. HarteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Kentucky Road Oiling Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- INTERNATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Mosely v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Brewer v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Southern Auto Company v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.