Legal Opinion

Sponseller v. Kimball

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 34,074PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1903 Mrs. Sponseller acquired 120 acres of land in Hillsdale county, and by 1919 had reduced the mortgage thereon from $2,700 to $1,200. In 1919 her husband made a deal with Kimball to purchase the adjoining 200 acres and three lots in Moscow. Sponseller had no money to pay on the purchase and on August 13th the deal was closed by deed from Kimball to plaintiffs by the entireties and mortgage back for $11,056, executed by both plaintiffs to Kimball, covering the land purchased and Mrs. Sponseller’s 120 acres. The sum covered the whole purchase price and also the $1,200 mortgage, which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horvath v. National Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Weidner v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sanborn v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Warren v. Federal Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Smith v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Carpenter v. American Excelsior Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. Horn v. CookeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Donald Mannix v. County of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API