Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Duluth

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 2017No. A17-0275Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS; Judge ■

Joel Johnson bought land on Park Poirit in Duluth intending to construct a harbor-vieW hotel. Eventually foiled by zoning restrictions, Johnson commenced an inverse-condemnation action by serving the city with a summons and complaint in November 2013, but he did not file his complaint in the district court until nearly three years later. The district court applied Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 5.04(a) and dismissed Johnson’s complaint with prejudice for failing to meet the one-year complaint-filing deadline. The district court soon granted Johnson’s motion for relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API