Legal Opinion

Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. Carnes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1935No. 24912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant, plaintiff in error, operated an oil refinery. The plaintiffs were lessees of land below the refinery. A creek ran near tlie refinery and down through the land leased by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs recovered a judgment in the trial court upon evidence tending to prove that' the defendant permitted certain oil refuse and other deleterious substances to escape from its refinery into the creek and that thereafter heavy rains caused the creek to overflow and deposit said substances upon and damaging their growing crops. This judgment was rendered upon a verdict which was the result of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. WilcoxsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Pipeline Co. v. CrauthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corp. of Oklahoma v. OzmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Cimarron Valley Pipe Line Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Cleary Petroleum, Inc. v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API