Legal Opinion

Rodrigue v. Morin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 13, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Joseph and Laurette Rodrigue owned in Augusta an irregularly-shaped tract of land, on which was their house, about nineteen acres in area, bounded on the northerly side by Thomaston Road (also known as Eastern Avenue) and on the easterly side by Pleasant Hill Road. Early in 1972, the Rodrigues placed the tract for sale, employing a real estate broker for that purpose. Defendant, Oscar Morin, having shown some interest in purchasing most of the tract, without the house, the broker prepared a rough sketch of the tract from a city tax map on which he marked off a small parcel in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rusha v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Perkins v. ConarySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Hardison v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drinkwater v. Patten Realty Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Howe v. NataleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Hedberg v. WallingfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. Howe v. NataleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Howe v. NataleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API