Legal Opinion

Howe v. Natale

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

451 A.2d 1198 (1982)

Frank I. HOWE, Jr. et ux.

v.

Anthony J. NATALE et ux.

v.

Dean A. FALES, Jr. et ux.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Argued September 21, 1981.

Decided November 3, 1982.

Waterhouse, Carroll & Cyr, Peter L. Edmands (orally), Biddeford, for plaintiffs.

Rysman & Turner, Warren M. Turner (orally), Yarmouth, for defendants and third-party plaintiffs Natale.

Walker, Bradford & Hull, Yarmouth, John D. Bradford (orally), Biddeford, for defendants.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., GODFREY, NICHOLS, CARTER, VIOLETTE and WATHEN, JJ., and DUFRESNE, A.R.J.

NICHOLS, Justice.

The Defendants and Third-Party…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Batchelder v. TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Milliken v. BuswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Rusha v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API