Legal Opinion
Howe v. Natale
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 3, 1982PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
The Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, Anthony Natale and Mary-Yvon Na-tale, appeal from a judgment of the Superi- or Court, York County, which accepted the report of a referee in this controversy over a boundary. The disputed property, located on Ocean Avenue in Kennebunkport, is a gore approximately three feet by 100 feet between a lot owned by the Natales and a lot owned by the Plaintiffs, Frank Howe and Elsie Howe. The Third-Party Defendants, Dean Fales and Martha Fales, were the Natales’ predecessors in title. The Superior Court found that the Howes had established…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Batchelder v. TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Milliken v. BuswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Rusha v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Nyzio v. VaillancourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Kinney v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Emerson v. Maine Rural Missions Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Dionne v. LeClercSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Kopenga v. Davric Maine Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Baptist Youth Camp v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.