Legal Opinion

Ennen v. Integon Indemnity Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2012No. S-13832PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jacob Ennen was seriously injured while he was a passenger in Gordon Shanigan's car. Shanigan's insurer, Integon Indemnity Corporation (Integon), paid $50,000 to cover Shanigan's possible liability to Ennen. Under Alaska insurance statutes, Ennen would also likely have been entitled to underinsured motorist benefits under Shanigan's policy. However, Integon's policy was inconsistent with these statutes, and Integon told Ennen that he was not entitled to any additional money. Six years later, some time after Integon learned that its underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lockwood v. Geico General Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API