Legal Opinion

Dorothea W. Seymour v. Grant Thornton and Fox & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1996No. 94-3300PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

Dorothea W. Seymour appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims against the accounting firms of Grant Thornton and Fox & Company (“Fox”). Ms. Seymour sought indemnification for liability incurred by her in her capacity as co-trustee of the Pauline Brown Gillespie Trust (“Gillespie. Trust”). The district court held that Ms. Seymour’s active wrongdoing in administering the trust barred her from seeking indemnification from the trust’s accountants. The district court further held that the accountants owed no duty to Ms. Seymour to inform her of certain problems…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Ash Creek Mining Co. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Haysville U.S.D. No. 261 v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Cooper v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Cullen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Becky J. Kidd v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Thayer C. Lindauer and Helen Lindauer, Husband and Wife v. Thomas M. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Combs v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API