In Re Seeley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
29 Cal.2d 294 (1946)
In re HUGH R. SEELEY, on Habeas Corpus.
Crim. No. 4654.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Dec. 3, 1946.
Hugh R. Seeley, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, and Arthur A. Ohnimus, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.
SHENK, J.
This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner is confined in the State Prison at Folsom under a judgment of conviction on his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary of the first degree and an adjudication that he is an habitual criminal by virtue of his admission of two prior convictions of a felony. The basis…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.