Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Zebre

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1990No. 88-263PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In this case, we address the question of whether John A. Zebre, a practicing attorney d/b/a John A. Zebre, P.C. (Zebre), owed a duty to Patricia A. Brooks (Brooks) and First Interstate Bank, N.A., Casper (Bank), the co-trustees of the Brooks marital trust, who were not clients of Zebre. The claims against Zebre had their genesis in his representation of members of the Arambel family in connection with a contract to lease, and an option to purchase, a ranch. Zebre’s clients were the lessees and optionees under the contract. The claims against Zebre are asserted by Brooks and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MulliganWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bevan Ex Rel. Bevan v. FixWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bowen v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jack v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Los AngelesWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API