Legal Opinion

Cauldwell v. Curry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1884No. 10,730PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellants’ complaint is for an injunction restraining the collection of a ditch assessment, and contains the following material allegations: That a petition was filed for the construction of a ditch; that William New, Jacob Slifer and James King were appointed viewers; that they were not disinterested freeholders of Hancock county, and that King never owmed real estate in that county; that Slifer was a member of the board of commissioners of the county at the time he was appointed a viewer; that the board did not make an order finding that the viewers were householders or freeholders;…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Board of Commissioners v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Gavin v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API