Legal Opinion
Hemphill v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action 09-4 (RMC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
This case is the latest chapter in pro se Plaintiff Allegra D. Hemphill’s never-ending litigation against Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Procter & Gamble Company. Ms. Hemphill has filed numerous patent infringement lawsuits against Defendants, none of which has been successful. Citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) and (b)(6), Ms. Hemphill alleges in her Amended Complaint that Defendants deceived the Court in her prior patent infringement case. See Am. Compl. ¶ 1 [Dkt. # 3]. The Court already has rejected such accusations against…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Boling v. U.S. Parole Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Youngin's Auto Body v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Tri-State Truck Insurance v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.