Legal Opinion

Wiggin & Co. v. Ampton Investments, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 29, 1999No. 98 Civ. 7616(RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Ampton Investments, Inc. (“Ampton”) and Laurence N. Strenger (“Strenger”) (collectively “A & S”) have again moved to stay this action brought by plaintiff Wiggin & Co. (“Wiggin”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to stay is granted, with leave granted to Wig-gin to move to dissolve upon any of the conditions described below.

The Parties

Wiggin is a British law firm with a Los Angeles office. Alleging diversity jurisdiction, Wiggin seeks to recover some $325,-000 in legal fees for work alleged to have been performed in Great Britain and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Village of Westfield, N.Y., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Welch's, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. De Cisneros v. YoungerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Radioactive, J v. v. MansonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Dore v. WormleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. GoldenTree Asset Management, L.P. v. Longaberger Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Mouchantaf v. INTERNATIONAL MODELING AND TALENT ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Gustavia Home, LLC v. Criminal Court for the City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API