Wiggin & Co. v. Ampton Investments, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Ampton Investments, Inc. (“Ampton”) and Laurence N. Strenger (“Strenger”) (collectively “A & S”) have again moved to stay this action brought by plaintiff Wiggin & Co. (“Wiggin”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to stay is granted, with leave granted to Wig-gin to move to dissolve upon any of the conditions described below.
The Parties
Wiggin is a British law firm with a Los Angeles office. Alleging diversity jurisdiction, Wiggin seeks to recover some $325,-000 in legal fees for work alleged to have been performed in Great Britain and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Village of Westfield, N.Y., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Welch's, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- De Cisneros v. YoungerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radioactive, J v. v. MansonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Dore v. WormleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- GoldenTree Asset Management, L.P. v. Longaberger Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Mouchantaf v. INTERNATIONAL MODELING AND TALENT ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Gustavia Home, LLC v. Criminal Court for the City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.