Rivenbark v. Southmark Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff argues on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice his breach of contract suit against defendants and in holding him in contempt for failing to comply with an interlocutory order. Plaintiff also contends that the evidence did not support the trial court’s determination that plaintiff had the ability to pay the monies ordered. We hold that Judge Hobgood’s 12 June 1984 order commanding plaintiff to pay a contested sum of money to the clerk of court was erroneous and must be reversed. We affirm the order finding plaintiff in contempt of court but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Powe v. OdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goss v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Foy v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Mulholland v. MulhollandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Ray v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Food Service Specialists v. Atlas Restaurant Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.