Legal Opinion

Goss v. Battle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1993No. 9221SC900PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a trial court must consider less severe sanctions before dismissing a plaintiff’s complaint under Rule 37(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellants argue the rule enunciated in Foy v. Hunter, 106 N.C. App. 614, 418 S.E.2d 299 (1992) and Rivenbark v. Southmark Corp., 93 N.C. App. 414, 378 S.E.2d 196 (1989), which require a trial court to consider lesser sanctions before dismissing an action under Rule 41(b), should be extended to include a trial court’s decision to dismiss an action under Rule 37(d) as well.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Foy v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Fulton v. East Carolina Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. F. E. Davis Plumbing Co. v. Ingleside West AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Rivenbark v. Southmark Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Hursey v. Homes by Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Sabates v. SabatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Badillo v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Badillo v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API