Lobdell v. Geib
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the court of common pleas, Ramsey county, denying a motion for a new trial. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
Plaintiff complains that on or . about April 19th and 29th, May 1st, 5th and 30th,' 1870, defendant Mary Geib, wife of the defendant Casimer Geib, broke and entered a room and office in plaintiff’s possession and occupation, and there committed divers trespasses, of a grossly insulting and offensive character.
Defendant Casimer Geib was called as a' witness for the defence, and was asked by his counsel the following questions : “ From April 19th to May 30th, 1870, what was the character of Mr. Lobdell’s conduct towards you during the transactions referred to in the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Funkley v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Gaffney v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888