Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1990No. LGBC 863, 864, 865; CA A44848 A44849, A44850; LGBC 871; CA A45837; LGBC 873, 874, 875; CA A46545 A46546, A46547; SC S35703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a case of judicial review of seven orders of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission (the Boundary Commission) annexing seven different parcels in the unincorporated Lane County community of Santa Clara to the City of Eugene (Eugene). Petitioners, who are individual residents of Santa Clara, seek review in this court, claiming that: (1) the annexations were unlawful because Santa Clara was a “proposed city,” and territory in a “proposed city” cannot be annexed to another city; (2) four of the annexations were legislatively validated by a statute, ORS 199.534, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donaldson v. LANE CTY. L. GOV. BDRY. COM'NOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API