Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1989No. 890; CA A49438; 898; CA A49898; 902; CA A60823; 907; CA A61501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Petitioners seek review of two Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission orders approving the annexation of non-contiguous land to the City of Eugene. We affirm.

We have previously decided two of petitioner’s three assignments of error in a companion case that is presently before the Supreme Court;1 therefore, we address only the question whether contiguity is required for annexations within the jurisdiction of boundary commissions under ORS 199.490(1). We conclude that it is not.

Petitioners are residents of Santa Clara, an unincorporated territory, who contest the City of Eugene’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawks v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. City of the Colony v. City of FriscoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OwenbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Dement Ranch v. Curry County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API