Legal Opinion
RUTLAND AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. Seward
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 3, 1968No. 1006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
The plaintiff petitioned the Court of Chancery for Rutland County, under the Declaratory Judgment Act, for a declaration of its rights under a leasing agreement made with the defendant in 1957. On March 2, 1968 the chancellor entered a decree, holding the lease to be in full force and effect and the defendant to be without right to terminate the undertaking.
The leased premises consist of a rectangular lot six hundred feet square; its purpose is for the operation of an “Open Air Theatre, Movie Type.” It appears that the result reached by the chancellor was dictated by the habendum. It is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winslow v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Geyer v. LietzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Burns v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Syms v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Preferred Physicians Mutual Management Group, Inc. v. Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk Retention Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pults v. City of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- Waldrop v. SiebertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.