Waldrop v. Siebert
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
McCALL, Justice.
The appellees brought this action to recover possession of leased premises from the appellant. The case was tried before the court without a jury on agreed stipulations of fact. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed therefrom. The basic question in the case being one of law, is “Does the lease between the parties give the appellant lessee the right to perpetually renew it.”
On July 20, 1963, the appellees executed a written lease of the premises to' the appellant for an original term of two years to run from July 20, 1963 to July 19,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crommelin v. Thiess & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Hyatt v. Vincennes National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hallock v. KintzlerOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- McCREIGHT ET UX v. GirardoOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Tischner v. RutledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Womack v. HycheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Davis v. Nokomis Quarry, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.