Legal Opinion

Packard Motors Co. v. Tally

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 6 Div. 367PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The plaintiff sued out a garnishment upon a judgment. The garnishee answered in writing denying indebtedness in due form under Code 1923, §§ 8055, 8067. Thereafter plaintiff obtained an order for an oral examination before the court. Code 1923, § 8067. On oral examination the court rendered judgment against the garnishee for the amount of the plaintiff’s debt. The garnishee appeals.

The oral answer .disclosed the following facts: The defendant in the judgment was employed by the garnishee as an automobile salesman. By the contract of employment he was to be allowed a commission on cars sold by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Archer v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Alexander v. Pollock & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. NathanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. White v. KahnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Garrett v. Mills.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyer v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Hubbard v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Brondum v. RosenblumMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Coosa Land Co. v. StradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. First Nat. Bank of Brantley v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API