Legal Opinion

Coosa Land Co. v. Stradford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding upon a judgment. Code, § 8051 et seq.

Judgment went against the garnishee upon oral answer. Code, § 8067. The garnishee appeals.

In such case the answer must affirmatively disclose an indebtedness of the garnishee to the judgment debtor, or possession and control of property or effects of such defendant, or other matters defined in Code, § 8055.

If plaintiff desires to controvert the truth of the answer, he may contest under the statute. Otherwise, the answer is con clusive. White v. Kahn, 103 Ala. 308, 15 So. 595; Jefferson County Savings Bank v. Nathan, 138…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicrosi v. IrvineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. NathanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. White v. KahnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Packard Motors Co. v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. STATE NAT. BANK OF DECATUR AT ONEONTA v. TownsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Deloney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Hollis v. BenderAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Coosa Land Co. v. StradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API