Legal Opinion

Brondum v. Rosenblum

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. 27233PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPack, J.

J. 0. Brondum, appellant, obtained a judgment, growing out of an automobile accident, against ■Charles Rosenblum, in June, 1926. Appellant had been unable to collect his judgment, and' on April 13, 1927, caused a writ of garnishment to issue on said judgment and to be served on H. Rosenblum, father of Charles Rosenblum, which writ was returnable before the circuit court on the ,4th Monday of September, 1927.

The garnishee, the appellee herein, answered the writ, denying any indebtedness and with big' answer filed what appellee terms “Notice of Special Matter under the General Issue.” On the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prudential Trust Co. v. Merchants' Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Packard Motors Co. v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Paisley ex rel. Hooper v. Park Fireproof Storage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  4. Howell v. Moss Point Furniture Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Columbus Insurance & Banking Co. v. HirshMississippi Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. v. ColterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Johnson v. Dutch Mill Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. SampsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Peoples Bank v. GoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API