Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Brantley v. Standard Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 4 Div. 672PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Garnishment proceedings upon a judgment. The appeal is from the judgment rendered upon oral answer of the garnishee. '■

The inquiry is: Does the oral answer affirmatively disclose an indebtedness due from the garnishee to the defendant, subject to the process of garnishment, in excess of the amount for which judgment was rendered?

Mr. Jones, the judgment debtor, was, at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment, November 22, 1928, president of Standard Chemical Company, the garnishee.

The fiscal year of the garnishee company ran from June 30th to July 1st of the succeeding year. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Archer v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Alexander v. Pollock & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. NathanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Packard Motors Co. v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Ely v. BlackerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Allison v. Gate Electronics, Inc. (In Re Mycro-Tek, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Deloney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Piper Ice Cream Co. v. J. L. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. In re LivelyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API