Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 16, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendants Clackamas County and its Board of County Commissioners appeal from a decree enjoining them from implementing or enforcing an initiative ordinance known as “Ballot Measure No. 10, Natural Rivers Measure — Clackamas River Corridor,”① adopted by the voters of Clackamas County at the general *772election of November 7, 1972. The trial court held that the people of Clackamas County have no authority to adopt zoning legislation by the initiative process; that even if such authority existed, the procedural requirements of ORS ch 215 were not complied with in the adoption of the ballot…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Schubel v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Wimer v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- City of Mosier v. Hood River Sand, Gravel & Ready-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Austin v. DanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.