Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Paulton Coal Mining Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1928No. Appeal 41PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. Claimant’s husband, Harry Floyd, was fire boss in defendant’s mine. He was killed by an explosion while examining the mine for gas early in the morning before the miners entered for ithe day’s work. The only question is whether the explosion resulted from Floyd’s violation of the Act of Assembly of June 9, 1911, P. L. 756, as amended by the Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 716, which provides that in making the examination the fire boss shall use no light other than that enclosed in an improved safety lamp, and that any fire boss who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Walcofski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Blaeser v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paul Gima v. the Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Bobereski, Adm. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Sharpe v. Federal Window & Office Cleaning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Robertson v. Rieder & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Ruttenburg, Exr. v. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API