Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Castillo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2004No. Petition 182 EAL 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Prothonotary is ordered to consolidate this case and 593 EAL 2003, and the parties are directed to brief the following issue:

Should this Court reconsider its decisions in Commonwealth v. Lord, 553 Pa. 415, 719 A.2d 306 (1998), and Commonwealth v. Butler, 571 Pa. 441, 812 A.2d 631 (2002), so as to allow discretion in the intermediate appellate courts to review an issue that was not raised in a timely statement of matters complained of on appeal under Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b); if so, what standards should…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API