Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1990No. 1192 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Gerleana Callahan (Claimant) seeks review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision granting Bethlehem Steel Corporation’s (Employer’s) petition to terminate Claimant’s benefits as of April 7, 1986 pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 (Act). On review, Claimant raises the issue of whether substantial competent evidence supports the referee’s findings that her disability ceased and that work was available to her within her capabilities while Employer requests imposition of costs and counsel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Grabish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Patel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Sauquoit Fibers Company)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Phillips v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Cittrich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API