Legal Opinion

Larkins v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1950No. 31191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs in-this action, James and Mary Larkins, husband and wife, with their large family of children, moved from Duluth, Minnesota, to Tacoma, during the year 1946. For approximately twenty years prior to this time, Mr. Larkins had been in the employ of a railroad, and, as a side line, had bought and sold scrap metal.

The defendant, St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Company, a corporation, has for many years been engaged in the logging *712and lumber business in the state of Washington, its principal place of business being in Tacoma'. The corporation conducts extensive operations in and around Ohop…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Brown v. BrewWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Beckman v. BrickleyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Spokane Canal Co. v. CoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Interchange Associates v. Interchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Lande v. South Kitsap School District No. 402Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Benchmark Land Co. v. City of Battle GroundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Lande v. SOUTH KITSAP SCH. DIST.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Larkins v. ST. PAUL & TAC. LBR. CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API