Legal Opinion
Brown v. Brew
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1918No. 14174PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered December 12, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action-on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMobbis, J.
Appellant brought this action to recover a commission on the purchase of timber, basing his right of recovery upon the following contract:
“This agreement made and entered into this, the 11th day of November, 1912, by and between T- H. Brew of Puyallup, Washington, and O. W. Brown, of Seattle, Washington.
“Witnesseth: That the said T. H. Brew has this day entered into an agreement with said O. W. Brown, that if at any time in the future, the said T. H. Brew or any of his subsidiary companies, purchases the timber or land and timber on the northeast quarter of section thirty-four, in township…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Hawley v. Kenoyer, Washington Territory1879
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Harris v. MorgensenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Brewster District Unit v. MonroeWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Larkins v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.