Legal Opinion
Spokane Canal Co. v. Coffman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1910No. 9129PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered February 4, 1910, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This is the second appeal in this action. When the case was here before upon the appeal of the plaintiff in the action, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Spokane Canal Co. v. Coffman, 54 Wash. 645, 108 Pac. 1106. In the opinion, we said:
“The record shows that they [respondents at that time] are still in default under the contract, and unless a new contract has been entered into, extending the time of payment, or waiving all payments past due, appellant is clearly entitled to a judgment of rescission and for possession of the land.”
When the case was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradley v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Spokane Canal Co. v. CoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Terry v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Kinne v. LampsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Dent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cedarhome Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Brewster District Unit v. MonroeWashington Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.