SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY v. Donovan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
A jury awarded appellee damages for injuries sustained by her while she was in appellant’s store. The main contention on this appeal concerns appellee’s status at the time of her injury and the consequent duty owed her by appellant. Appellant contends that appellee was a mere licensee to whom it was not liable in damages unless the injuries were the result of its active negligence. Appellee says she was an invitee to whom appellant owed-the duty of furnishing her with reasonably safe premises. 1
Appellee, an adult, testified that she, her mother and her eight-year-old…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Kane Ex Rel. Eastern Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Kennedy v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Fleckenstein v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Orum v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Farrier v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Barlow v. RocheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- ITT Continental Baking Co. v. EllisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.