Legal Opinion

Orum v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1958No. 2079PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant wife, whom we shall refer to as the appellant, and her husband sued for damages resulting from an injury she sustained from a fall in one of appellee's stores. At the conclusion of their case, appellee moved for a directed verdict. When the motion was denied, appellee stood upon its motion and offered no testimony. The case was submitted to the jury which returned a substantial verdict for appellants. Appellee then moved to set aside the verdict and enter judgment in its favor. This motion was granted, and our question is whether it was properly granted.

With…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY v. DonovanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Brodsky v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Shoppers Food Warehouse MD Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Marinopoliski v. IrishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Napier v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Kindig v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Link v. Hutzler Bros.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API