Legal Opinion
Fielder v. Gehring
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 18, 2000No. Civil 99-00350 SOM/BMKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIMS; ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DUE PROCESS CLAIMS IN THE DEFENDANTS’ INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
On May 14, 1999, Plaintiff William Robert Fielder (“Fielder”) filed a Complaint. The Complaint was amended on October 20. Fielder claims that Howard B. Geh-ring (“Gehring”), 1 Stephen Thompson (“Thompson”), 2 and Nancy Murphy (“Murphy”) 3 (collectively “Defendants”), in their individual and official capacities, violated his constitutional rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hale v. Hawaii Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
- Justin Lane v. City of Tucson, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025