Legal Opinion
Boshes v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 3, 1973No. 68 C 1454PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DECKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Roger Boshes, Esther K. Roerig, Curtis Collum, Frank Jackson and James Taylor, filed this private an*590titrust action on ibehalf of themselves and “all those similarly situated” against General Motors Corporation (“GM”), described in the complaint as the “colossus of the giant automobile industry”, seeking treble damages for alleged violations of the federal antitrust laws, including combining and conspiring to monopolize and fix prices on the passenger automobile line of commerce in the United States market. See, 15 U.S.C. § 15. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Western Liquid Asphalt Cases. State of Alaska v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.