Legal Opinion

In Re Veiga

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 3, 2010No. Misc. Action 10-370(CKK)(DAR), 10-371(CKK)(DAR)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Joint Motion by Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) and two of its attorneys, Rodrigo Pérez Pallares (“Pérez”) and Ricardo Reis Veiga (‘Veiga”) (collectively, “Applicants”), to Compel Discovery from Respondent Alberto Wray (“Respondent”). See Applicants’ Joint Mot. to Compel Disc, from Alberto Wray and Mot. for Expedited Consideration (“Mot. to Compel.”), Docket No. [66]. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall GRANT Applicant’s Motion to Compel, subject to certain conditions and limitations.

I.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Deloitte LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States of America v. Iss Marine Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API